The naturalistic biological view claims the process of evolution as its explanation for life. This philosophical/ biological theory uses evolution to fit a worldview where no God exits. It is simply the naturalistic world, hence "naturalism". Although this theory is severely littered with problems, here are some of the major ones:
Firstly, when someone refers to evolution, they are mostly likely referring to macroevolution which is utterly impossible. Microevolution on the other hand, has been proven true, in that within a species, certain characteristics or physical traits may be shifted according to surrounding circumstances, this is simply adapting. The problem lies however, in naturalism attempting to apply this "survival of the fittest" theory to explain the origin of life. It simply cannot. In the early stages/ beginning of the earth, when it was a huge bubbling sea of "primordial soup", little ancient organisms slowly formed to become the extremely diverse earth we have today. How is this possible? For the second law of thermodynamics clearly outlines that the universe is inevitably going toward destruction, whereas evolution turns it on its head and instead says that the earth came goes from chaos to order. Simply acknowledging the human/ animal aging process refutes this theory! Also, life cannot come from non life. Evolution has tried so many times in the biology/ chemistry realm to loophole this with ridiculous and fraudulent experiments, but time and time again it cannot be done.
Secondly, macroevolution (the evolution I will be describing here) is founded on the idea that each species came about by a series of mutations. But aren't mutations seldom beneficial to organism? Mutations are in fact normally bad or harmful and result in their dying out. To explain a little further, evolutionists use the four winged fruit fly as an example "good" mutations, however, this normally two winged organism is unable to use its second pair because of a lack of associated muscles and therefore it dies rapidly in its enclosed laboratory environment because of its inability to fly. As a result, this hopeless cripple of a bug has no ability to reproduce and would then be selected out according to survival of the fittest/ natural selection because of its experimentally ensued mutation. Another example that the theory that a series of mutations allowed for the many species we have today is false, is the example of antibiotic resistance. When a certain bacteria strain is resistant to antibiotics because of a defect or mutation in genetic code, when the parent is re- introduced, the resistance bacteria is crippled and will disappear because they aren't able to reproduce as fast. This failed attempt of "fitness lost" shows how in reality, these mutated organisms are not kept and developed more into a different species, but in fact destroyed because they are defected and unable to live and pass on those defective/ mutated genes.
Thirdly, the fossil record that should strongly support evolution, instead lacks in any whatsoever. For example, if a common ancestor by ways of natural selection and mutations slowly evolved into completely different species, there would be different transitional phases to map out this progress. However, these transitional phases cannot be found in any fossil record to wholeheartedly support evolution. To counteract this argument, evolutionists have devised a "theory" of the Cambrian explosion. Instead of slow progress, drawn out over millions and billions of years, these diverse species exploded all at once. Rather than naming them "created", they "exploded" ; which is the naturalists attempt to cover up the overwhelming amount of hard evidence against evolution as a theory for the origin of life from non life. Evolution/ naturalism is not a scientifically grounded belief, but rather an ignorant explanation life without God.
